Christoph Re: AH Only configuration using ipsecuritas? by tji on 20:02:53 +0200 Terr-Oz: Many VPN devices don't support AH. However, if the demand for AH is here, I think about implementing it in the next major release. Re: AH Only configuration using ipsecuritas? by cnadig on 08:37:45 +0200 Hello, IPSecuritas does not support AH at the moment as I thought it was pretty much obsolete. AH Only configuration using ipsecuritas? AH Only configuration using ipsecuritas? by Terr-Oz on 21:47:38 +0200 Has anyone been able to configure ipsecuritas for this setkey policy? ah/transport/src-dst/require ? IPSecuritas appears to only configure racoon for esp. We have a SonicWall Firewall/VPN appliance in the server room, also no problems with IPSecuritas on that. The Trendnet just didn't jive with the Riverstone/Lucent fiber-backbone router we connect to and finally went nuts. I had a Trendnet VPN router before and it had MUCH better documentation and configuration. Your setup tips would be very much appreciated. Randy Re: D-Link DI-804HV Compatability? by Red on 20:49:06 +0100 I have an 804 at home and an 808 at the office, I would like to use them with IPSecuritas. If anyone needs help, post here and I'll try to provide a little writeup. Everything's good now, with a Rev A1 box with FW 1.40 and and a Rev C1 box with FW 1.42. I think I had the remote network address and subnet a little mixed up and that was preventing success. I got mine working (with two different DI-804HV's, actually). Re: D-Link DI-804HV Compatability? by Randall on 00:18:31 +0100 Has anybody found a setup since? I feel like I'm close, but it's not working. So far so good! Re: D-Link DI-804HV Compatability? by Randall on 06:51:32 +0100 Does anyone have any tips for configuring ISSecuritas with a D-Link DI-804HV router? Has anybody found a setup since? I feel like I'm close, but it's not working. Apple presumably introduced code signing of kernel plugins for good reasons and, whilst many software vendors who ship older unsigned plugins are referencing the above as a short term fix (google the above command line!), you do this at your own risk.Re: D-Link DI-804HV Compatability? by hammer32 on 15:24:12 +0200 I tried VPNTracker, they didn't have one to test, but I was able to set it up and have used it while on the road for several months. Having done this, I can confirm that IPSecuritas now works fine on Yosemite without having to disable NAT-T! You can revert to the previous behaviour by:sudo nvram boot-args="kext-dev-mode=1" Googling around Yosemite has become more picky about kernel extensions that it will load and now rejects unsigned files (probably quite a good idea, but not good for IPSecuritas). Nov 5 11:49:04 xxxxxxxx : ERROR: invalid signature for, will not load In any case, even on my tame home network, which shouldn’t need NAT-T it just allowed me to pass traffic for one of the three tunnels at random.Ĭonfiguring any new IPSec environment always seems to consume half a day, and I like IPSecuritas so it was worth a bit of effort to get it working. I was sceptical about this as having to disable NAT-T is too broken. Googling around, it seems a few folks have hit this and the perceived wisdom seems to be to turn off NAT traversal on the tunnel options to get things working in Yosemite. Whilst it seems to work and establishes all of the SAs sucessfully via ISAKMP, it doesn’t then move any protected traffic. I’ve just upgraded my Mac Book to Yosemite and the only casualty I’ve found so far is the IPSecuritas IPSec VPN wrapper application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |